Unit III Essay
In this assignment, you will refer back to the two handouts indicated below and answer the questions associated with them. Both items listed below will be responded to within the same document, which you will then submit. The response to each item will consist of at least 200 words each, and any sources used, including your textbook, should be cited and referenced properly at the end of your responses using APA formatting. It is not necessary to copy the items below into your document; however, please compose essays that include an introduction, body, and conclusion:
1. Please refer back to the handout, “Can a Defendant Who Lies…,” to respond to the following questions. The Illinois appellate court, citing a U.S. Supreme Court Justice, says that “Perhaps we could never succeed in intelligibly defining the kinds of matter we understand to be embraced within the shorthand description of battered woman’s syndrome.” Why not? Would you be able to formulate an effective legal description of battered woman’s syndrome? If so, what would it be?
2. Please refer back to the handout, “Is there a Meaningful Difference…,” to respond to the following questions. Miller claimed to be sane before and after the killing, but insane during the time the crime was committed. His attorneys asked that, at the end of the trial, the jury be instructed on the issue of temporary insanity, and that they be told that “regardless of its duration, legal insanity that existed at the time of the commission of the crime is a defense to the crime.” Why do you think that the trial court refused to give the jury instructions regarding the insanity defense, which the defendant wished to have communicated? In this case, the appellate court reversed the defendant’s conviction and remanded the case for a new trial. On what basis was that decision reached? Do you agree that the appellate court should have reached such a decision? Why, or why not? What does this case have to tell us about the difference between insanity and temporary insanity? Are differences between the two terms significant in cases such as this one? Why, or why not?
Information about accessing the Blackboard Grading Rubric for this assignment is provided below.
Unit IV Case Study
This case study assignment explores euthanasia. Research euthanasia in your state, and address the items below:
What is euthanasia?
Identify and describe laws regarding euthanasia in your state.
Explain a recent case about euthanasia and its outcome.
Based upon what you have read, give your opinion on euthanasia and support your argument.
Your response should be at least two (2) pages in length (not including the references page). While you may use your textbook to complete this assignment, you are required to use at least two (2) outside resources, which may be from the CSU Online Library or from other professional journals. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations. All references and citations used must be in APA style.
Information about accessing the Blackboard Grading Rubric for this assignment is provided below.
Unit V Case Study
Access and read What Constitutes the Crime of Stalking? After reading, please address the items below:
Provide a brief overview of the handout.
What are the elements of the crime of stalking under the statute discussed in this case?
Do you agree with the court of appeals that the statute is not unconstitutionally vague?
Is the evidence in this case sufficient to support a stalking conviction?
Your response
