Diverse Organizational Structure
Rubric
NR447_Conflict_Resolution
NR447_Conflict_Resolution
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetailed description of conflict, including type of conflict
view longer description
After an introduction paragraph, paper thoroughly provides observations of conflict in practice setting. The paper thoroughly states if negative outcomes were observed and identifies the specific type of conflict observed. It provides details of what happened, including who was involved, what was said, where it occurred, and what was the outcome that led you to decide the conflict was unresolved.
60.0 pts
After an introduction paragraph, paper clearly provides observations of conflict in practice setting. It clearly states if negative outcomes were observed and identifies the specific type of conflict observed. It provides some details of what happened, including who was involved, what was said, where it occurred, and what was the outcome that led you to decide the conflict was unresolved.
53.0 pts
After an introduction paragraph, the paper provides observations of conflict in practice setting. It briefly states if negative outcomes were observed and identifies the specific type of conflict observed. It provides few details of what happened, including who was involved, what was said, where it occurred, and what was the outcome that led you to decide the conflict was unresolved.
48.0 pts
After an introduction paragraph, the paper provides observations of conflict in practice setting. It does not state if negative outcomes were observed or identifies the specific type of conflict observed. It provides few details of what happened, including who was involved, what was said, where it occurred, and what was the outcome that led you to decide the conflict was unresolved.
23.0 pts
After an introduction paragraph, the paper does NOT provide observations of conflict in practice setting. It does not state if negative outcomes were observed or identifies the specific type of conflict observed. It provides NO details of what happened, including who was involved, what was said, where it occurred, and what was the outcome that led you to decide the conflict was unresolved.
0.0 pts
60.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFour stages of conflict and relationship to identified conflict, including delegation issues
view longer description
Paper thoroughly outlines the four stages of conflict, as described in Finkelman, and how the stages relate to the example. It states if delegation was an issue in the conflict.
40.0 pts
Paper clearly outlines the four stages of conflict, as described in Finkelman, and how the stages relate to the example. It states if delegation was an issue in the conflict.
35.0 pts
Paper generally outlines the four stages of conflict, as described in Finkelman, and mostly how the stages relate to the example. Does not state if delegation was an issue in the conflict.
32.0 pts
Paper briefly outlines the four stages of conflict, as described in Finkelman, and minimally how the stages relate to the example. Does not state if delegation was an issue in the conflict.
15.0 pts
Paper does not outline the four stages of conflict as described in Finkelman. It does not state how the stages relate to the example. It does not state if delegation was an issue in the conflict.
0.0 pts
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStrategies for conflict resolution and collaboration with a leader
view longer description
Paper describes in detail strategies for conflict resolution and collaboration with a nurse leader to resolve conflict. Besides the course textbook, the paper cites two scholarly articles and thoroughly summarizes all resources.
60.0 pts
Paper generally describes strategies for conflict resolution and collaboration with a nurse leader to resolve conflict. Besides the course textbook, the paper cites one scholarly article. It generally summarizes both of them.
53.0 pts
Paper briefly describes strategies for conflict resolution and collaboration with a nurse leader to resolve conflict. It only cites the course textbook. It cites an additional source but NOT a scholarly article. The summary lacks detail.
48.0 pts
Paper minimally describes strategies for conflict resolution and collaboration with a nurse leader to resolve conflict. It only cites the course textbook and no additional sources. The summary lacks detail.
23.0 pts
Paper describes NO strategies for conflict resolution and collaboration with a nurse leader to resolve conflict. It does NOT cite the course textbook or other sources. The summary is missing.
0.0 pts
60.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion and summary
view longer description
Paper provides a thorough conclusion or summary and description of plans for dealing with conflict in the future.
20.0 pts
Paper provides a general conclusion or summary and description of plans for dealing with conflict in the future.
18.0 pts
Paper provides a brief summary and description of plans for dealing with conflict in the future.
16.0 pts
Paper provides a minimal summary and description of plans for dealing with conflict in the future.
8.0 pts
Paper does not provide a conclusion or summary and NO future plans for dealing with conflict.
0.0 pts
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of writing
view longer description
Content is organized, logical, and grammar, punctuation, spelling, and sentence structure are correct. APA formatting is apparent, utilizing CCN template. References are properly cited within the paper. Reference page includes all citations; proper title page and introduction are present and evidence of spell and grammar check is obvious. Less than three errors are noted.
20.0 pts
Content is mostly organized, logical, and grammar, punctuation, spelling, and sentence structure are correct. APA formatting is apparent, utilizing CCN template. References are properly cited within the paper. Reference page includes all citations; proper title page and introduction are present and evidence of spell check and grammar check is obvious. Four to six errors are noted.
18.0 pts
Content is somewhat organized, logical and grammar, punctuation, spelling, and sentence structure are correct. Minor APA formatting errors exist. References are properly cited within the paper. Reference page includes all citations; proper title page and introduction are present and evidence of spell check and grammar check are not obvious. Seven to 10 errors are noted. 16 points ☐
16.0 pts
Content is somewhat organized, but may lack logic. Several errors occur in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and sentence structure. Major APA formatting errors exist. Reference page does not match up with in-text citations, i.e., references may be missing for in-text citations, or references appear with no comparable in-text citation. Eleven to 15 errors are noted.
8.0 pts
Content is disorganized and writing has numerous grammar, spelling, or syntax errors. APA formatting was not used. Spell check and grammar check are not obvious. More than 15 errors are noted.
0.0 pts
20.0 pts
Total Points: 200.0
Previous Next
