Continuation Or Elimination Of Education Disability Categories
Construct an evidence-based scholarly paper arguing for either the continuation or elimination of education disability categories. Follow the guidelines below as you construct your paper.
Consider your examination of professional journals and associations related to special education.
Include the following headings in your paper:
Introduction: The introduction should include the guiding inquiry that your paper seeks to answer: Should special education disability categories be continued or eliminated?
Review of Literature: Determine the argument you wish to make about special education disability categories. Defend your position, argument, or stance with supporting evidence from a review of the literature that is needed to support your premise.
Conclusion: Draw closure to the paper as you revisit your guiding inquiry established in the introduction. Respond to the inquiry with a conclusion that is supported by the references you reviewed in the body of the paper.
References: Select a minimum of five current sources to develop your subject and defense. Current sources are those that have been published within the past 5 years. These sources may come from your research on your topic throughout this course.
Note: While reading your sources, be very careful that you indicate for yourself whether the notes that you are taking are direct quotations or paraphrases.
Presentation:
The paper must include a title page, introduction, review of literature, conclusion, and reference list with a minimum of five citations. All of its asTpects, from citations to headings (which must be included), should conform to APA style. The paper should be 5–8 pages in length, double spaced, not including the cover page and reference list. Do not write in the first person.
