Evaluating Quantitative Design

 
A  researcher must be knowledgeable of the different quantitative research  designs and be able to effectively apply the best design as dictated by  the research question. For this assignment, you will create a 3- to  4-page document following the directions below.
Part I
Compare Methods
Compare and contrast two research methods. Give an  example of a situation (related to forensic counseling) in which each of  the two chosen methods can be applied.

Experimental
Quasi-experimental
Correlational
Survey
Developmental

Part II
Answer Questions
In reference to one of the two example research scenarios that you discussed above in Part I, further explore by answering the following questions (apply these questions to your own research project):

Determine a suitable research goal.
Discuss what type of sampling could be used for this study.
Identify which types of research designs above (from Part I) would be most appropriate to use.
State your hypothesis of the expected results for this proposed study.

Your final product will be in a Microsoft Word document  and be approximately 3–4 pages in length and utilize 2–3 scholarly  sources in your research. Your paper should be written in a clear,  concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship in  accurate representation and attribution of sources; and display accurate  spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Submission Details:

By the due date assigned, save your response as M2_A2_Lastname_Firstname.doc and submit it to the Submissions Area.

     Assignment 2 Grading Criteria  Maximum Points    Compare  and contrast two research methods. Give an example of a situation  (related to forensic psychology) in which each of the two chosen methods  can be applied.  20    Determine a suitable research goal.  16    Discuss what type of sampling could be used for this study.  16    Identify which types of research designs above (from Part I) would be most appropriate to use.  16    State hypothesis for the outcome of proposed study.  16    Wrote  in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical  scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources;  displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.  16    Total:  100          Due DateNov 28, 2018 11:59 PM Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: FP6030_M2A2_Grading_Rubric
This  table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The  first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a  numeric scoring method.CriteriaMaximum PointsGR1  Compare and contrast two research methods. Give an example of a  situation (related to forensic psychology) in which each of the two  chosen methods can be applied.20 points/ 20GR2 Determine a suitable research goal.16 points/ 16GR3 Discuss what type of sampling could be used for this study.16 points/ 16GR4 Identify which types of research designs above (from Part I) would be most appropriate to use.16 points/ 16GR5 State hypothesis for the outcome of proposed study.16 points/ 16GR6  Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical  scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources;  displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.16 points/ 16Total/ 100
Overall Score
Total Score
0 points minimum