Analyzing Published Research

 Analyzing Published ResearchCriteriaRatingsPts

Problem

30 to >27 pts
Includes  all elements in a manner that is clearly understood. • Problem  description provides focus of the group’s work. • Significance of the  problem is clearly stated and supported by current evidence. • Purpose  of paper is clearly stated.


27 to >25 pts
Missing  only one element OR One element is not presented clearly • Problem  description provides focus of the group’s work. • Significance of the  problem is clearly stated and supported by current evidence. • Purpose  of paper is clearly stated.


25 to >22 pts
Missing  two elements OR One element is not presented clearly • Problem  description provides focus of the group’s work. • Significance of the  problem is clearly stated and supported by current evidence. • Purpose  of paper is clearly stated.


22 to >0 pts
Missing  two or more elements AND/OR One or more elements are not presented  clearly • Problem description provides focus of the group’s work. •  Significance of the problem is clearly stated and supported by current  evidence. • Purpose of paper is clearly stated.

/ 30 pts

Description of Findings: Summary

60 to >55 pts
Summary omits no more than one required item from the Evidence Matrix Table.


55 to >50 pts
Summary omits two or three required items from the Evidence Matrix Table.


50 to >45 pts
Summary omits four required items from the Evidence Matrix Table.


45 to >0 pts
Summary omits five or more required items from the Evidence Matrix Table.

/ 60 pts

Description of Findings: Description

60 to >55 pts
Description  includes ALL elements. • What concepts have been studied? • What  methods have been used? • Who are the participants or members of the  samples? • What instruments have been used? Did the authors describe the  reliability and validity? • How do you answer your original “the  purpose of this paper” question? Do the findings of the articles provide  evidence for your answers? If so, how? If not, what is still needed to  be able to answer your question? • What is needed for the next step?  Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work.


55 to >50 pts
Description  missing no more than one element. • What concepts have been studied? •  What methods have been used? • Who are the participants or members of  the samples? • What instruments have been used? Did the authors describe  the reliability and validity? • How do you answer your original “the  purpose of this paper” question? Do the findings of the articles provide  evidence for your answers? If so, how? If not, what is still needed to  be able to answer your question? • What is needed for the next step?  Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work.


50 to >45 pts
Description  missing no more than two elements. • What concepts have been studied? •  What methods have been used? • Who are the participants or members of  the samples? • What instruments have been used? Did the authors describe  the reliability and validity? • How do you answer your original “the  purpose of this paper” question? Do the findings of the articles provide  evidence for your answers? If so, how? If not, what is still needed to  be able to answer your question? • What is needed for the next step?  Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work.


45 to >0 pts
Description  missing three or more elements. • What concepts have been studied? •  What methods have been used? • Who are the participants or members of  the samples? • What instruments have been used? Did the authors describe  the reliability and validity? • How do you answer your original “the  purpose of this paper” question? Do the findings of the articles provide  evidence for your answers? If so, how? If not, what is still needed to  be able to answer your question? • What is needed for the next step?  Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work.

/ 60 pts

Description of Findings: Conclusion

20 to >17 pts
Summary  paragraph includes ALL major findings from article. • Independently  extracts complex data from a variety of quantitative sources, presents  those data in summary form, makes appropriate connections and inferences  consistent with the data, and relates them to a larger context. •  Recognizes points of view and value assumptions in formulating  interpretation of data collected and articulates the point of view in a  given situation. • Identifies misrepresentations in the presentation of  quantitative data and the logical and empirical fallacies in inferences  drawn from data.


17 to >15 pts
Summary  paragraph omits ONE major finding from article. • Independently  extracts complex data from a variety of quantitative sources, presents  those data in summary form, makes appropriate connections and inferences  consistent with the data, and relates them to a larger context. •  Recognizes points of view and value assumptions in formulating  interpretation of data collected and articulates the point of view in a  given situation. • Identifies misrepresentations in the presentation of  quantitative data and the logical and empirical fallacies in inferences  drawn from data.


15 to >12 pts
Summary  paragraph omits TWO major findings from article. • Independently  extracts complex data from a variety of quantitative sources, presents  those data in summary form, makes appropriate connections and inferences  consistent with the data, and relates them to a larger context. •  Recognizes points of view and value assumptions in formulating  interpretation of data collected and articulates the point of view in a  given situation. • Identifies misrepresentations in the presentation of  quantitative data and the logical and empirical fallacies in inferences  drawn from data.


12 to >0 pts
Summary  paragraph omits THREE or MORE major findings from article. •  Independently extracts complex data from a variety of quantitative  sources, presents those data in summary form, makes appropriate  connections and inferences consistent with the data, and relates them to  a larger context. • Recognizes points of view and value assumptions in  formulating interpretation of data collected and articulates the point  of view in a given situation. • Identifies misrepresentations in the  presentation of quantitative data and the logical and empirical  fallacies in

/ 20 pts

Grammar, Spelling, Mechanics, and APA Format

30 to >27 pts
•  Length is three full pages. • Used appropriate APA format and is free  of errors. • Includes ALL headings and subheadings as instructed. •  Grammar, spelling, and mechanics are free of errors.


27 to >25 pts
•  Length is no more than one quarter page under or over. • Used  appropriate APA format, with one type of error. • Includes ALL headings  and subheadings as instructed. • Grammar, spelling, and mechanics have  one type of error.


25 to >22 pts
•  Length is no more than one half page under or over. • Used appropriate  APA format, with two types of errors. • Includes ALL headings and  subheadings as instructed. • Grammar, spelling, and mechanics have two  types of errors.


22 to >0 pts
•  Length is three quarters of a page or more under or over. • Attempts  made to use APA format; three or more types of errors are present. •  Includes ALL headings and subheadings as instructed. • Grammar,  spelling, and mechanics have three or more types of errors.

/ 30 ptsTotal Points: 0

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Order your essay today and save 25% with the discount code: COCONUTPlace Order
+