For this Discussion Board, students are asked to view the video The Stanford Prison Experiment an answer the following:
https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/blackboard.learn.xythos.prod/5a343eaadaf7a/543191?response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%27Stanford%2520Prison%2520Experiment%25281%2529.mp4&response-content-type=video%2Fmp4&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20191203T195807Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=21600&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAIL7WQYDOOHAZJGWQ%2F20191203%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=2e9825ee74be2e53862a499b6967ee93121b8b1b3dd55e73e96bb5625482ca94
In the thread title: [Nurture or Nature]
What prevented “good guards” from objecting or countermanding the orders from tough or bad guards?
If you were the experimenter in charge, would you have done this study? Would you have terminated it earlier? Would you have conducted a follow-up study?
Knowing what this research says about the power of prison situations to have a corrosive effect on human nature, what recommendations would you make about changing the correctional system in your country?
This Discussion Board will be graded.